Thursday, March 1, 2018

Reading Notes: Chinese Fairy Tales, Part B

Part B of this unit was just as awesome as part A! This might be my favorite unit so far, in fact. For today, the two stories I wanted to focus on the most are "How the River God's Wedding Was Broken Off" and "Retribution."

How the River God's Wedding Was Broken Off

I liked this story because it was similar to a trickster story, only the one doing the tricking was not meant to be a "bad" character. Instead, it was a good character who was actively helping another character. The bad people, who were sacrificing girls to the River god were punished and the one's that weren't learned their lesson. I think this would be a fun story to retell, but with a different setting. Perhaps they all work together and the "girl" is someone who they give all of the hard tasks to. Then the person in charge sees what they are doing and makes them do it instead? Haha, maybe. I like that there was a sense of justice with the end, but it also felt a little like a parent punishing you for your own good, in my opinion.

Retribution

I really liked this story because of its parallel structures. The first man accidentally killed the water-carrier, who was then reborn wealthy. Then, the reborn water-carrier accidentally killed the old man next door. Both of them hid from what they did and let it seem like the other fell on their own. It implies maybe the older man will be reborn, possibly in higher standing, and may go on to accidentally kill someone who will be reborn and so on. I am a sucker for parallel story telling!

Edit: After re-reading the story a bit more carefully, I realized it was actually the older man, old Wang, who accidentally killed the water-carrier. Then, the water-carrier reborn accidentally killed old Wang. The younger man, Ma, was actually just witnessing everything from his house. This makes the story even more interesting to me, since the same two people were accidentally killing each other.



Bibliography: "Retribution" and "Hot the River God's Wedding Was Broken Off" from The Chinese Fairy Book, ed. by R. Wilhelm and translated by Frederick H. Martens (1921). (Web Source)

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Reading Notes: Chinese Fairy Tales, Part A

Two stories from this section stood out to me. The first was The Cave of the Beasts because of how awful the father was. He got the duck eggs for himself and his wife, but when his daughters ate them, he wanted to leave them to be eaten by wolves?! I think he sucks, and when the youngest daughters found all of the jewels, I was rally happy for them. I didn't like how he acted like he was grateful they were alive and then took all of the jewels back home. I think in my ideal story, the girls go back with the jewels and he is eaten by wolves. It's only fair.

The second story was one that I liked. The King of the Ants was a fun, short story that I thought was funny. The small people reminded me of Thumbellina (only even smaller!) which was a story I adored growing up. This is a story I would like to retell simply because I think there are a lot of fun and different possible outcomes! I was a little confused as to how the men were so tiny and why they went back into an ant hill? Maybe they rule over the ants and there are other tiny people somewhere? Why did no one really comment on the size difference between the small people and the scholar? Things I would definitely wants to address in my story.



Bibliography: King of the Ants and The Cave of the Beasts from The Chinese Fairy Book, ed. by R. Wilhelm and translated by Frederick H. Martens (1921).

Friday, February 23, 2018

Week 6 Storytelling: The Ghost-Brahman


Once there was a spoiled Brahman, who always got whatever he wanted from the world. Growing up he was allowed to do whatever he wanted, have any toys he wanted, and say whatever he wanted. When he was grown, and it came time for him to find a wife, he went around his village to all eligible women. He criticized each one harshly, causing many of the women to cry. After examining every last woman, he made his decision. He chose a woman who he saw to be the loveliest and best suited for him, and they were wed the next day. He took his new bride home to live with him and his mother.

In the Brahman’s home, he was even more vile than he was in public. Not only that, but he was violent as well. Any time things did not go his way, he would lash out at his new wife, often resorting to hitting her. When he stormed off in a rage, the mother would comfort the younger woman, for she had been on the receiving end of her son’s anger before he married. The women formed a bond this way that was as strong as anything.

One day, the Brahman told his mother and wife that he would be leaving to travel for a while. “I grow tired of this place,” he told them, “and I wish to go and see what else is in the world that can entertain me. I will be back whenever I please.” After dinner that night, he packed a small bag to take with him in the morning. Before the sun had risen the next day, he started off on his journey.

With the Brahman gone, the two women felt like they could breathe again, though neither had realized she was holding her breath. When the Brahman hadn’t returned by nightfall, they held a small celebration, eating and drinking some of their finest foods. Both women slept peacefully that night, for the first time in a long time.

The next morning, when the women awoke, they saw who they thought was the Brahman outside of their house. Unknown to them, this was a ghost who shared the exact likeness of the Brahman. He entered the house to find the two women looking frightened. With a large, warm smile, he held out his arms and said, “Fear not, mother and wife. I have returned a new man. Going forward, we shall live our lives very differently.”

Over time, the women saw what the ghost-Brahman had spoken was true. He was kind to the mother and wife, doting on them with love and caring for them at all hours of the day. For a month or so, the wife and mother were very skeptic of this seemingly reformed Brahman, but after a while they came to trust in his new nature. The three were living happily.

Some years went by, and eventually the real Brahman returned home. On the day he came back, he was shocked to find another Brahman, in his exact likeness, living with his wife and mother. Outraged, the Brahman stormed into the house and demanded that the imposter Brahman leave immediately. The ghost-Brahman refused. The Brahman vowed to set things right, and set off to do just that.

The angry Brahman searched until he found a king willing to hear his case. The king listened intently, and not knowing how to solve the dispute. He told the Brahman to come back the next day. This cycle continued for a week before the Brahman decided he had had enough. Seeking a second opinion, he stumbled upon some ranchers who claimed to have their own king. The Brahman asked to see this king, and they agreed.

The rancher king heard the Brahman’s case and said, “If you truly wish you settle this issue, return here tomorrow with this imposter Brahman, and I will set things right.” And so, the Brahman left to get the ghost-Brahman.

The next day, the Brahman returned with not only the ghost-Brahman, but also with his wife and mother. The four of them stood before the rancher king. He examined each Brahman, being sure to note any small differences he could find. After many hours, he concluded everything about them was exactly the same. To this, the wife spoke up.

“Your Majesty, I disagree. The Brahman who sought you out is a cruel and horrible man. He left many years ago to travel as he wished. This other Brahman has been here since he left, and he has been kind to us.”

Seeing a way to test the Brahman, the king asked, “Brahmans, you are willing you allow your wife to speak such things in your stead?”

The ghost-Brahman looked at his wife and then to the king. “Of course, King. She only speaks the truth, how can I be upset?”

The actual Brahman’s face flushed red. “Well,” he said, full of anger, “I will not stand for it. This woman speaks blasphemies and should be punished!”

The rancher king nodded after each Brahman spoke. After a few moments, he responded. “I have lived here a long time, so I do remember you, Brahman,” he said to the actual Brahman. “I remember how terrified your wife and mother were of you.” He then turned to the ghost-Brahman and said, “I remember when you first came to the village to live as the Brahman. You have treated these women well these few years, and even further you have been a strong, kind member of this community that the first Brahman never was. Because of these things, I declare you the new Brahman, rightful husband and son.”

Hearing this, the actual Brahman became even more enraged. Sensing this, the other ranchers grabbed him and carted him away. The ghost-Brahman revealed he was a ghost, but the wife and mother did not mind. The three went home and lived there happily for the rest of their days.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Author's Note: In the original story of The Ghost-Brahman, the Brahman was actually a poor man who left to get enough money for him, his wife, and his mother to live on. He was kind and not a bad man. The Ghost-Brahman came the day after he left on his journey. When the original Brahman came back, he was distressed that there was an impostor Brahman in his place. Seeking council with a nearby king, he told his story and was asked to come back every day for a long time because the king could not make a decision. After he left the palace crying one day, some gopis (cowboys) invited him to see their king. This king told the Brahman to return with the ghost-Brahman. The next day, the cowboy king told both Brahman that whoever could shrink down and fit inside of a tiny bottle would be the true Brahman. The actual Brahman said ti was impossible, but the ghost-Brahman complied and got in the bottle. The cowboy king put a stopper on the bottle, trapping the ghost, and the Brahman was free to go back to his mother and wife. 

I chose to change the story because I think the pattern of the impostor being outed is a good one, but is has definitely been done many times. Instead, I thought it would be interesting to have the ghost-Brahman be a better man than the actual Brahman, so he was allowed to stay. 

Bibliography: "The Ghost-Brahman" from Folk-Tales of Bengal by the Rev. Lal Behari Day, with illustrations by Warwick Goble (1912).

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Reading Notes: Bengal, Part A

I really liked the stories for this week, but I think my favorite was The Ghost-Brahman. This story reminded me a little of the Bible story where two women had babies, but one woman's baby died. She then stole the other baby, and their case went before some king. He declared the baby should be cut in half , and half given to each mother. The fake mother complied, but the real mother pleaded that the baby should remain unharmed and given to the fake mother. The king saw her as the true mother and gave her the baby back. The Ghost-Brahman story was different from this in that nothing was going to be split up, but similar in that an impostor stole something and in answering/completing a task a certain way, they were found out to be the fake.

I have a feeling this sort of story may be found else where in the world, and I think it is an interesting plot to follow. Maybe when I rewrite a story this week I will rewrite this one using this plot device.I liked the persistent Brahman and think that would be someone I might focus on.

(Folk-tales of Bengal on wikimedia)

Bibliography: Folk-Tales of Bengal by the Rev. Lal Behari Day, with illustrations by Warwick Goble (1912). (Web Source)

Friday, February 16, 2018

Week 5 Story: Riddle Me This


Riddle Me This
(click the link to read!)

(Calvary Cemetery, Queens, New York on Wikipedia)

Let me know your result in the comments, if you'd like!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Author's Note: This week I wanted to re-tell a few of the riddles from the Twenty-Two goblins unit. Because of my Project, I have been learning how to use Twinery to create branching stories, so I thought this was the perfect practice. 

In the original stories, there is a King who is sent by a monk to bring a body containing a goblin back. The King gets the body, but the goblin tells him riddles. If the king answers correctly, the goblin goes back to his tree. The king repeats this cycle, you guessed it, twenty-two times. The last riddle stumps the King, and he is finally able to continue. In the original story, the goblin warns the king that the monk will try to kill him to gain power, and advises the king on how to kill the monk instead. In my interactive story, I took those parts out because it was getting a little long. 

Bibliography: Sanskrit Vetālapañcaviṃśati translated by Arthur Ryder

Thursday, February 15, 2018

Reading Notes: Twenty-Two Goblins, Part B

Part B of these stories might have followed the same pattern of riddle, correct answer, goblin escaping, repeat; however, these riddles had a different sort of pattern from the ones in Part A. These were more focused on "here is what happens, who is to blame/why did this happen?" Overall, I think I liked this set of stories more. The last one also had my head spinning so I wrote out the story and I think the children would simultaneously be each other's uncles/aunts and nieces/nephews.


(Diagram of the Family Tree made by me)


I feel a bit more inspired after reading Part B on what I might do for storytelling. I think I want to practice with Twinery and made a story that way. The stories would be written and someone could click the answer they want and the paths would move accordingly. The only thing is I don't have something concrete worked out for someone answering incorrectly on purpose. Maybe I can plan this week and figure something out.

Bibliography: Sanskrit Vetālapañcaviṃśati translated by Arthur Ryder

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Reading Notes: Twenty-Two Goblins, Part A

For reading A of this week, there was definitely a theme of "to which should the girl be given"  or "which one is the cleverest/bravest." I enjoyed reading these riddles and even managed to guess 3 of the 7 correctly!

In all honesty, I'm not sure what to say about these stories. I liked reading them, but nothing struck me as a "wow!" sort of moment, and I didn't think of any creative ideas about possible retellings. I chose this unit because I love riddles and I wanted to read a few. Maybe when I retell the story I will come up with very different riddles.

I do feel bad for the wise King because he has to go back and get the goblin so many times. I wonder if the conclusion is him giving up and his head exploding, or if the goblin finally asks a riddle the King cannot answer. After twenty-two times of retrieving a body, I'm not sure I could handle it any more.

I also like the parallel structure within the stories. Like when the three brothers are tested about their expertise in Food, Women, Cotton. That sort of structure helps the story flowing nicely and I think I'll definitely make use of it.



Bibliography: Sanskrit Vetālapañcaviṃśati translated by Arthur Ryder

Famous Last Words: Not the End All, Be All

This is my last post for Mythology-Folklore, and honestly it’s a little sad. This week I took advantage of the extra week of reading and wri...